再探确定共有物分割方法之诉的性质——兼评我国《民事强制执行法(草案)》第一百七十一条第三款  

A Further Discussion on the Nature of the Litigation of the Division Method of Common Property

作　　者：徐文海 Xu Wenhai

机构地区：[1]同济大学法学院

出　　处：《法治社会》2023年第4期115-126,共12页Law-Based Society

摘　　要：新近公布的《民事强制执行法(草案)》中,对共有物分割设专章予以规定,其深化《民法典》第三百零三条,赋予法院更为细化的规则指引,其中第一百七十一条第三款更是明确了申请分割之非讼审理方式。确定共有物分割方法之诉的性质应为诉之强制性合并(形成之诉与给付之诉),并非非讼事件,亦不契合“诉讼事件非讼化”之理论构造。分割判决产生类似公证债权文书的强制执行力,非讼法理融于其中以贯彻“促进物之效用”及“分割之自由”原则。In the newly published Civil Mandatory Executive Law(draft),there is a special chapter on the division of common property,which deepens the provisions of Article 303 of the Civil Code and gives the court more detailed rules and guidelines.Among them,the third paragraph of Article 171 further clarifies the non-litigation trial mode of applying for division.The nature of the litigation to determine the method of dividing common property should be a compulsory merger of the litigation(the action for formation and the action of prestation),which is not a non-litigation event and does not conform to the theoretical construction of“non-litigation of litigation events”.The division judgment produces a coercive force similar to that of the Notarial Creditors Rights Document,and the non-litigation theory is integrated into it to implement the principles of“promoting the utility of things”and“freedom of division”.

关 键 词：非讼事件 诉的强制性合并 诉讼事件 程序保障 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]