刑事审判违限责任的历史考察与再构建  

The Historical Investigation and Reconstruction of Criminal Trial Violation of Liability

作　　者：班艺源 李麒[1] BAN Yi-yuan;LI Qi(School of Law,Shanxi Universily,Taiyuan Shanci 030006,China)

机构地区：[1]山西大学法学院,山西太原030006

出　　处：《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第4期43-52,共10页Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：最高人民法院司法案例研究课题“中国古代司法责任制案例研究”(2021ISFAL005)。

摘　　要：在我国的司法实践中一直存在案件超期现象,但是当今法学理论界和实务界却缺乏对超期案件的关注。超期案件的产生基于复杂的中国实践,流水线式案件移送流程、独特被害人反应机制、辩审冲突、法院内部讨论决定机制,以及错案给法官带来的司法判决压力均成为超期案件产生的诱因。除显性超期外,延期审理、中止诉讼、诉讼程序转化等程序滥用也会带来案件的隐性超期问题。文章通过考察中国古代法律对案件超期后法官违限责任的具体规定,并结合时代特征分析其成因,从严格法官违限责任、重大案件整体违限责任、多元化追责主体违限责任分担机制三个方面对当今中国法官案件超期责任进行再构建。In the judicial practice in China,there have always been overdue cases,which lacks sufficient concern from the theoretical and practical circles of law..The emergence of overdue cases is due to such complicated factors of judicial practice in China as the pipeline case transfer process,the unique victim response mechanism,the debate and trial conflict,the internal discussion and determining mechanism within the court,as well as the judicial decision pressure brought by the wrong case to the judge.In addition to overt overstaying,the abuse of procedures such as adjournment of trial,suspension of proceedings,and transformation of proceedings also brings about the issue of recessive overstaying of cases.By investigating specific provisions of Chinese ancient law on judges’liability of breaching limitation after a case’s expiration,,combined with its temporal characteristics,this paper analyzed the causes of its formation and reconstructed the judges’liability of overdue cases in China from three aspects:strict judges’liability for breaching limitation,the entire liability for breaching limitation in major cases,and the sharing mechanism of diversified subjects’liability for breaching limitation.

关 键 词：违限责任 超期案件 延期审理 法官责任 制度构建 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]