基于学生满意度的劳动教育实效性调查与评价——以四川省990名大学生为样本  

Investigation and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Labor EducationBased on University Students’ Satisfaction: A Sample of 990University Students in Sichuan Province

作　　者：康超 孟萍 KANG Chao;MENG Ping(School of Economics and Management,Neijiang Normal University,Neijiang,Sichuan,641100,China;School of Continuing Education,Neijiang Normal University,Neijiang,Sichuan,641100,China)

机构地区：[1]内江师范学院经济与管理学院,四川内江641100 [2]内江师范学院继续教育学院,四川内江641100

出　　处：《内江师范学院学报》2023年第7期84-93,共10页Journal of Neijiang Normal University

基　　金：四川省教育科研资助金项目“‘双减’背景下四川农村中小学教师核心能力提升路径研究”(2022)。

摘　　要：劳动教育是学生德智体美劳全面发展的内容之一,其重要性不言而喻。在具体实践中,劳动教育往往流于形式,实效性不高。因此,本研究根据劳动教育实效性模型,采用问卷调查,以四川省990名大学生为样本,从劳动教育的内容性、途径性、指导性、保障性、感知价值、学生满意度和行为意向等七个维度进行具体评价。实证分析发现,是否为独生子女、专业类别不同以及政治面貌各异的学生在七个维度上并没有显著区别;不同性别的大学生在劳动教育的内容性、途径性和行为意向三个维度上差别显著;是否为学生干部、学校类型不同的学生在七个维度均呈现显著差别;大学生所在年级不同对于劳动教育的内容性、学生满意度两个维度有显著差别;家庭所在地不同的学生在劳动教育的指导性和满意度两个指标上有显著差别。在各变量平均值对比中,劳动教育内容性的得分最高,指导性的得分最低。由此说明,研究样本对劳动教育具有基础认知,但高校劳动教育缺乏国家政策性支持,在机制建设、监督管理等指导性层面还具有一定欠缺。此外,高校劳动教育还存在区域层次性差异问题和个体差异性问题。因此,需要从国家、学校和个人三个层面进行政策调整。Labor education is one of the content for the comprehensive development of students’morality,intelligence,physical fitness,aesthetics,and labor skills.Its importance is evident.When it is implemented,it often falls into formalism and lacks effectiveness.Therefore,based on the model for the effectiveness of labor education,this study has conducted a questionnaire survey with a sample of 990 university students from Sichuan Province,and evaluated the performance of them in seven dimensions,namely,content,approach,guidance,guarantee,perceived value,student satisfaction,and behavioral intention.The empirical analysis has found that there were no significant differences among students with different family backgrounds(whether they are only child),majors they are studying,and their political affiliations in the seven dimensions.However,there were significant differences between male and female students in the content,approach,and behavioral intention dimensions.There were significant differences in all seven dimensions between those who were student cadres and those who were not,and between those in different types of schools in university.Additionally,there were significant differences in the content and students’satisfaction dimensions among students in different academic years,and in the guidance and satisfaction dimensions among students from different hometowns.In the comparison of the average scores of each variable,the score for the content dimension was the highest,while that for the guidance dimension was the lowest.This indicates that the research sample has a basic understanding of labor education,it lacks national policy support in universities and still has a certain deficiency in guidance,mechanism,and supervision and management.In addition,there are regional differences and individual differences in labor education in universities.Therefore,the related policy recommendations need to be made at three levels:national,university,and individual.

关 键 词：劳动教育 实效性 结构方程模型 量化分析 

分 类 号：D64[政治法律—政治学]