罗尔斯之后政治哲学的儒家之声——陈来政治哲学思想述要  

The Confucian Voice of Political Philosophy after Rawls:A Study on Chen Lai's Political Philosophy and Thoughts

作　　者：方旭东[1] Fang Xudong

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学现代中国思想文化研究所暨哲学系,上海200241

出　　处：《国际儒学（中英文）》2023年第2期13-23,186,共12页International Studies on Confucianism

摘　　要：罗尔斯的出现,使得政治哲学史由此分成两个阶段:前罗尔斯时代与罗尔斯时代。作为内地儒家代表性的学者,陈来没有专门写文章讨论罗尔斯,但他对李泽厚伦理思想的评论中涉及罗尔斯,尤其是其《政治自由主义》一书;另一方面,陈来对罗尔斯的重要批评者桑德尔的评论则可以视为是对罗尔斯的间接表态。所有这些(当然不止这些),构成陈来作为儒家学者对罗尔斯政治哲学的一种回应。这种回应足以表明,在罗尔斯之后的政治哲学舞台,儒家并未失声。The emergence of John Rawls(1921-2002)divided the history of political philosophy into two phases:the pre Rawls era and the Rawls era.As a representative scholar of mainland Confucianism,Chen Lai did not write an article specifically on Rawls,but his commentary on Li Zehou's ethical thought involved Rawls,especially his book Political Liberalism.On the other hand,Chen Lai's comments to Sandel,an important critic of Rawls,can be seen as an indirect statement of Rawls.All of this(and of course more than that)constitutes Chen Lai's response to Rawls's political philosophy as a Confucian scholar.This response is enough to show that Confucianism did not lose its voice on the stage of political philosophy after Rawls.

关 键 词：陈来 政治哲学 儒家 罗尔斯 

分 类 号：D0[政治法律—政治学]