《中庸》诠释与明代学术演变——以季本对朱子《中庸》诠释的批判为例  

An Interpretation of Zhong Yong and the Evolution of Academia during the Ming Dynasty:A Case Study of Ji Ben's Critique on Zhu Xi's Interpretation of Zhong Yong

作　　者：肖永明[1] 李江 Xiao Yongming;Li Jiang

机构地区：[1]湖南大学岳麓书院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《南开学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第4期80-89,共10页Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition

基　　金：湖南省社会科学重大学术和文化研究专项(21ZDAZ01)。

摘　　要：明代学术经历了由早期“宗朱”向中晚期“崇王”的演变。阳明学者季本通过对《中庸》“已发未发”“戒惧慎独”等内容作出心学化的诠释,积极回应、参与明代学术的这种演变。与此同时,他又坚持以朱子为对话者,透过对朱子相关诠释的批判来展开自己的思想。这折射出在明代“由朱转王”的学术演变进程中朱学始终未因阳明学的发生、发展而“离场”的事实。季本对《中庸》的诠释及对朱子的批判,成为我们把握《中庸》诠释与明代学术演变之互动关系以及厘清明代学术演变进程中的一些细微面向的重要个案。During the Ming Dynasty,academia underwent a transformation from the early“Zong Zhu”(宗朱,revering Zhu Xi) to the mid and late“Chong Wang”(崇王,revering Wang Yangming).Yangming scholar Ji Ben actively responded to and participated in this evolution of Ming Dynasty academia by providing a Neo-Confucian interpretation of certain contents in Zhong Yong(中庸),such as“already revealed but not yet fully developed”and“caution and fear in solitude”.Simultaneously,he adhered to a dialogue with Zhu Xi,expressing his own ideas through a critical examination of Zhu Xi's related interpretations.This reflected the fact that Zhu Xi's Neo-Confucianism remained relevant in the process of the Ming Dynasty's academic evolution from“Zhu”to“Wang”.Ji Ben's interpretation of Zhong Yong and his critique of Zhu Xi serve as significant cases to understand the interactive relationship between the interpretation of Zhong Yong and the evolution of Ming Dynasty academia,as well as to clarify some subtle aspects of the Ming Dynasty's academic transformation.

关 键 词：《中庸》 季本 朱子 明代学术 

分 类 号：B248[哲学宗教—中国哲学]