刑事诉讼事实观之阐释及纠偏  

Interpretation and Correction of the View of Facts in Criminal Procedure

作　　者：崔瀚月 Cui Hanyue(Kaiyuan Law School,Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200030,China)

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海200030

出　　处：《漯河职业技术学院学报》2023年第4期69-73,共5页Journal of Luohe Vocational Technical College

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目(18CFX037)。

摘　　要：传统上,刑事诉讼事实观是一种事实发现理论的结果事实观,受“真理符合论”的影响,无论是“客观真实说”还是“法律真实说”均遵循了这一事实观的框架。随着协商性司法等理念的兴起,有论者借鉴哈贝马斯的“法律商谈理论”提出了“程序性共识观”等多元化的事实观。“法律商谈理论”属于立法层面的构想,“程序性共识观”实际上是对于阿列克西“法律论证理论”的本土化设计。近年来,刑事诉讼法学界对该理论存在误读,应当予以纠偏。Traditionally,the view of facts in criminal proceedings is a view of facts of discovering the theory through the facts.Influenced by the correspondence theory of truth,both objective truth theory and legal truth theory follow the frame of this view of facts.With the rise of the idea of deliberative justice,some theorists propose a pluralistic view of facts,such as procedural consensus theory based on Habermas’legal negotiation theory.Legal negotiation theory is a legislative concept,while procedural consensus theory is actually a localized design of Alexy’s legal debate.In recent years,the theory has been misinterpreted in criminal procedure law,and should be corrected.

关 键 词：程序性共识观 法律真实 哈贝马斯 阿列克西 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]