检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王幼平[1,2] Wang Youping
机构地区:[1]北京大学考古文博学院 [2]北京大学中国考古学研究中心
出 处:《南方文物》2023年第3期147-156,共10页Cultural Relics in Southern China
基 金:郑州中华之源和嵩山文明研究会基金项目(编号:ZD-7)资助。
摘 要:本文以石器技术讨论为切入点,首先观察莫斯特技术的时空分布,寻找晚更新世早期现代人进入华南的证据。通过梳理石叶、细石叶技术在华南及周边地区出现的情况,认识旧石器晚期革命与现代人走出非洲大浪潮对南方地区的影响途径。再重点讨论晚更新世到全新世早、中期华南砾石工业传统发展历程与现代人扩散南线的关系。最后综合探讨自然地理环境与人类适应选择等多重因素对现代人扩散南方路线的影响,指出晚更新世以来华南地区早期现代人的迁徙扩散路线,远较已有的“南线说”内涵更复杂多样。The discussion in this paper pivots around lithic technology of the southern dispersal route of early modern humans(the“Southern Route”).It first examines the temporal and spatial distribution of Mousterian-like technology,looking for evidences of the route of early late Pleistocene modern humans’migration into South China.Through review of the blade and micro-blade technology presented in South China and its surrounding areas,more clear understanding can be achieved about in what ways the Upper Paleolithic revolution and the great wave of modern human out of Africa influenced the region.It follows with discussion around the relation between the development of pebble tool tradition in South China from late Pleistocene to Holocene and the spread of modern human to the south.The last part of the paper studies comprehensively the influences of multiple factors,such as natural geographic environment and human adaptation,on the dispersal route of modern humans to the south,suggesting that the dispersal route of early modern humans in South China since the late Pleistocene is far more complex and diversified than what the current“Southern Route”theory describes.
分 类 号:K87[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学] K854[历史地理—历史学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117