康德历史哲学的定位:希冀抑或归宿?  

To Discuss the Positioning of Kant’s Historical Philosophy:Hope or End?

作　　者：郭继民 Guo Jimin

机构地区：[1]四川思想家研究中心

出　　处：《德国哲学》2022年第2期82-97,316,317,共18页Chinese Journal of German Philosophy

摘　　要：关于康德的历史哲学,学界存在不同的声音:推崇者以“第四批判”名之,反对者则认为它根本达不到“三大批判”的层次,顶多是第三批判的延续。有争论是正常的,但前提是须至少做好三件事:首先要知晓康德历史哲学的内在逻辑,其次要将其置于整体哲学中以厘定其地位,最后亦要考虑康德历史哲学对后世的影响。如此,方能对康德的历史哲学有一个较清晰的认识和定位。When we talk about Kant’s philosophy of history,there are different voices in the academic circles:the advocate named“the fourth criticism”,the opponent thinks that it can’t reach the level of“the three great critiques”.It is normal to have the different view,but the premise things that we must do at least:first of all,to understand the inherent logic of Kant’s philosophy of history,then to place it in the overall philosophy to determine its status,and finally to consider the influence of Kant’s philosophy of history on future generations.Only in this way can we have a clearer understanding of Kant’s philosophy of history.

关 键 词：康德 历史哲学 逻辑推演 

分 类 号：B516.31[哲学宗教—外国哲学] K01[历史地理—历史学]