公共行政中的定量与定性方法研究  

A Comparative Study of Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis——Enlightenment to the Study of Public Administration

作　　者：班戈[1] BAN Ge(Law School,Guangdong Peizheng College,Guangzhou Guangdong 510800,China)

机构地区：[1]广东培正学院法学院,广东广州510800

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第7期51-54,共4页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：公共行政研究乃至整个社会研究的过程中长期存在着关于两类研究方法的讨论,即定量与定性研究。理解定量研究与定性研究的区别和联系十分重要,但关键却并不在于其本身,而是一系列诸如哲学范式、理解、意义、事实和价值等概念。二者在哲学范式、目的、研究者被研究者关系以及理论构建上存在着诸多不同,但又具有各自不同的优势。对二者的互相补充、相互结合的混合研究方法设计越来越成为当今公共行政研究的趋势。对二者的比较研究可以辨析二者的差异,在研究过程中达到更好地结合,取得最佳研究效果。In the process of public administration research and even the whole social research,there have been discussions about two kinds of research methods for a long time,namely quantitative and qualitative research.It is very important to understand the difference and connection between quantitative research and qualitative research,but the key lies not in itself,but in a series of concepts such as philosophical paradigm,understanding,meaning,fact and value.There are many differences between them in philosophical paradigm,purpose,relationship between researchers and researchers,and theoretical construction,but they have different advantages.The design of mixed research methods that complement each other and combine each other has increasingly become the trend of public administration research.The comparative study of the two is not only to distinguish the differences between them,but also to achieve a better combination in the research process and achieve the best research results.

关 键 词：定量研究 定性研究 哲学范式 混合研究方法 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]