检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张琼 Zhang Qiong(Department of Electronics,Xinzhou Normal University,Xinzhou 034000,China)
出 处:《洛阳师范学院学报》2023年第7期71-75,共5页Journal of Luoyang Normal University
基 金:山西省高等学校哲学社会科学研究项目(2021zsszsx090)。
摘 要:在柳永词的历代评价中,有一种较为常见的“合论”现象。“合论”现象是文学评论家按照一定维度的品评标准将两个写作风格相似或文学地位相近作家的作品进行相互参照的文学鉴赏现象。在词学批评中将柳永与张先“合论”,体现了宋初词坛对“警策”之句的一种美学追求,时人所谓“张优柳劣”,实质是词派斗争的微妙结果;将柳永与康与之“合论”,体现了宋代词学所蕴含的道德因素的评价;将柳永与周邦彦“合论”,则是清代常州词派完成其理论建构的重要组成部分。“合论”现象本质上是词学批评的一种比较范式,具有较强的主观色彩和个人体验,对其应当持审慎态度。In the evaluation of Liu Yong's Ci in the past dynasties,there was a common phenomenon of “co-analysis”.Co-analysis is a phenomenon in literary appreciation in which literary critics compare the works of two writers with similar writing styles or similar literary status according to some dimensions of evaluation criteria.The co-analysis on Liu Yong and Zhang Xian in the criticism on Ci-poetics embodies an aesthetic pursuit of the refined and concise sentences with profound meanings in the early Song Dynasty.The so-called “Zhang Xian being superior to Liu Yong” is essentially the subtle result of the struggle of different Ci schools.The co-analysis on Liu Yong and Kang Yuzhi reflects the evaluation of the moral factors contained in the Ci-poetics of the Song Dynasty.The co-analysis on Liu Yong and Zhou Bangyan is an important part of the theoretical construction of Changzhou Ci School in the Qing Dynasty.The phenomenon of co-analysis is essentially a comparative paradigm of Ci criticism,which reflects strong subjective valuation and personal experience,and scholars should be cautious about the phenomenon.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49