检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龚卫东[1] 冯建泰 GONG Wei-dong(Yantai University,Yantai 264005,China)
机构地区:[1]烟台大学,烟台264005
出 处:《长春工程学院学报(社会科学版)》2023年第2期74-77,93,共5页Journal of Changchun Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:烟台大学研究生科研创新基金项目:情绪性信息和语义透明度对中国英语学习者加工英语复合词的影响研究(项目编号:KGIFYTU2208)。
摘 要:探讨中国英语学习者对英语复合词的加工,采用词汇判断实验,研究了情绪性信息与语义透明度对其影响。实验发现:情绪复合词和中性复合词的反应时和正确率均具有显著差异;透明复合词和晦涩复合词在反应时和正确率上具有显著差异;以被试作为随机变量时,二者的交互效应边缘显著,以实验材料作为随机变量时,二者的交互效应不显著。研究结果初步表明情绪性信息和语义透明度影响了中国英语学习者对英语二语复合词的加工,情绪性信息对语义透明度的调节作用较小。The present study investigates the influence of emotionality and semantic transparency on the processing of English compounds by Chinese learners of English based on the data obtained in a lexical decision task.The experimental results show that there are significant differences in reaction time and correct rate between emotional compound words and neutral compound words;there are significant differences in reaction time and accuracy between transparent compound words and obscure compound words;when the subject used as a random variable,the interaction effect of emotionality and semantic transparency is marginal significant.When the experimental stimulus used as a random variable,the interaction effect is not significant.These results indicates that emotionality and semantic transparency affects Chinese ESL learners’processing of compounds,and the moderating effect of emotional information on semantic transparency is small.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.187