检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋剑锋 王笛 孙秀梅[1] Song Jianfeng;Wang Di;Sun Xiumei(School of Business,Shandong University of Technology,Zibo 255012,China)
出 处:《科技管理研究》2023年第13期179-191,共13页Science and Technology Management Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目“跨界搜寻、资源拼凑对新创科技企业生态位蝶变的影响机制研究”(71902106);山东省高等学校“青创科技计划”创新团队项目“山东省装备制造业绿色低碳转型的新动能培育机理与实现路径研究”(2019RWG034)。
摘 要:基于资源编排理论,构建跨界搜寻、资源拼凑对新创科技企业持续性竞争优势的作用机制模型,检验速度型与品质型两种机会开发模式在这一影响过程中的中介作用,以及双元领导风格的差异化权变作用。通过对我国新创科技企业样本数据实证检验,结果表明,(1)跨界搜寻与资源拼凑均正向影响持续性竞争优势,且二者对持续性竞争优势的影响呈互补效应;(2)速度型机会开发与品质型机会开发均在跨界搜寻与资源拼凑影响持续性竞争优势过程中发挥中介作用,而跨界搜寻倾向于品质型机会开发模式获取持续性竞争优势,资源拼凑倾向于速度型机会开发模式获取持续性竞争优势;(3)跨界搜寻影响两种机会开发模式过程中,变革型领导风格发挥了差异化调节作用、交易型领导风格发挥了负向调节效应,相反,资源拼凑影响两种机会开发模式过程中,交易型领导风格发挥了差异化调节作用、变革型领导风格调节作用不显著。Based on the theory of resource arrangement,this paper constructs a mechanism model of the impact of boundary-spanning search and resource bricolage on the sustainable competitive advantage of new technology ventures,and verifies the mediating role of the speed type and quality type of opportunity exploitation models in this impact process,as well as the differential moderating role of ambidextrous leadership styles.Based on the empirical test of sample data of China's new technology ventures,the results show as follows:(1)Boundary-spanning search and resource bricolage both positively affect sustainable competitive advantage,and the effects of the two on sustainable competitive advantage are complementary;(2)Speed opportunity exploitation and quality opportunity exploitation both play an mediating role in the process of boundary-spanning search and resource bricolage affecting sustainable competitive advantage.At the same time,it is found that boundary-spanning search is more inclined to quality opportunity exploitation model to obtain sustainable competitive advantage,and resource bricolage is more inclined to speed opportunity exploitation model to obtain sustainable competitive advantage;(3)In the process of boundaryspanning search influencing the two modes of opportunity exploitation,transformational leadership style has played a differential moderating role and transactional leadership style has played a negative moderating role;On the contrary,in the process of resource bricolage affecting the two modes of opportunity exploitation,transactional leadership style played a differential moderating role,while moderating effect of transformational leadership style is not significant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30