检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孔德伦 Kong Delun
机构地区:[1]贵州省高级人民法院刑二庭
出 处:《中国社会科学院大学学报》2023年第5期142-155,160,共15页Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
摘 要:关于认罪认罚从宽制度理论模型的建构,主流观点认为其属于契约模式,也存在放弃审判制度模式、听取意见模式以及家长模式等观点,但现有理论模式缺乏足够的说服力和解释力。认罪认罚从宽制度属于共识性诉讼模式,哈贝马斯的商谈共识理论可以作为共识性诉讼模式的理论基础。共识性诉讼模式的要素包括共识的主体、共识的客体、共识的类型及共识的领域。共识性诉讼模式既体现于规范之维,又展现于实践之维。在认罪认罚案件中可能存在“共识失真”的情形,需要选择差异化防范进路。Regarding the construction of the theoretical model of leniency system of guilty plea,the mainstream view is that it belongs to the contractual model,and there are also views,such as abandoning the trial system model,listening to opinions model and parental model.However,the existing theoretical models lack sufficient persuasiveness and explanatory power.The leniency system of guilty plea belongs to the consensual litigation model,and Habermas‘theory of negotiated consensus can be used as its theoretical source.The elements of the consensual litigation model include the subject,object,type and domain of consensus.The consensual litigation model is reflected in both the normative and the practical dimension.In the cases of admitting guilty and accepting penalty,there may be“consensus distortion”,which requires a differentiated prevention approach.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7