能作诗的ChatGPT能否称得上艺术创作主体  

Could ChatGPT Who Can Write Poems be Considered a Subject of Artistic Creation

作　　者：马立新[1] 杨冬妮[1] MA Li-xin;YANG Dong-ni(Research Center For Digital Art Philosophy,Shandong Normal University,Jinan Shandong 250014,China)

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学数字艺术哲学研究中心,山东济南250014

出　　处：《内蒙古社会科学》2023年第4期43-51,共9页Inner Mongolia Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金艺术学项目“数字艺术非义行为及其对抗机理研究”(编号:20BC043)。

摘　　要：随着ChatGPT艺术创作能力的快速发展,其主体性建构成为一个重要学术议程。探讨ChatGPT主体性既不能脱离笛卡尔等人所建构的原典语境,也不能囿于西方话语框架,因为这个以理性为基石的框架越来越显现出保守性与局限性,为此,一个基于理性、意志和欲求能力三位一体的新型主体观被构建出来。依据这一系统观,目前的ChatGPT因为其算力结构缺失自我意识和欲求能力,尚不具备艺术创作的主体资格,而要赋予ChatGPT这两种功能又面临着诸多伦理和法理风险与挑战。只有在所有这些风险和挑战都足以被人类绝对应对和管控的条件下,我们才能赋予ChatGPT主体地位。With the rapid development of ChatGPT's artistic creation ability,the issue of its subjectivity construction has become an important academic agenda.Exploring the subjectivity of ChatGPT cannot be separated from the classical context constructed by Descartes and others,nor can it be confined to the Western discourse framework,because this framework based on rationality is increasingly showing conservatism and limitations.Therefore,a new principle of subjectivity based on the trinity of rationality,will,and desire ability has been constructed.According to this new systematic view,the current ChatGPT lacks self-awareness and desire ability due to its computational power structure,and does not yet possess the qualification of an artistic creation subject.However,endowing ChatGPT with these two functions faces many ethical and legal risks and challenges.Only when all these risks and challenges are sufficient for human absolute control can we give ChatGPT a position of the artistic subject.

关 键 词：ChatGPT AI艺术 主体 主体性 

分 类 号：TP18[自动化与计算机技术—控制理论与控制工程] J02[自动化与计算机技术—控制科学与工程] B15[艺术—艺术理论]