当事人申请行政程序重开权利的检视与完善  

Reviewing and Improving the Right of Parties to Apply for Reopening of Administrative Procedures

作　　者：刘欣琦 段妍霖 LIU Xinqi;DUAN Yanlin(School of Law,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411100,Hunan,China)

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411100

出　　处：《华南理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第4期88-98,共11页Journal of South China University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“瑕疵行政协议类型重塑及其裁判规则研究”(22CFX012)。

摘　　要：在促进行政争议实质性化解的时代背景下,以已过起诉期限为程序标的的行政程序重开制度具有重要意义。然而,行政程序重开制度自“王建设案”引入后在实践中存在参差,原因在于对“当事人申请行政程序重开是否属主观公权利”的认知存在分歧。从主观公权利理论和我国司法实践现实需求出发,宜将当事人申请重开权定位为一项主观公权利。基于此,在具体的制度设计方面,对于当事人的重开申请,行政机关应当分形式审查和实质审查两个阶段进行处理,当事人则可以根据行政处理决定提起履行之诉或撤销之诉;对人民法院而言,应以行政程序重开处理决定而非原行政行为为审判标的,辨明行政处理决定的性质,理清具体案件中的法院审查规则。In the context of promoting the substantive resolution of administrative disputes,the system of reopening administrative procedures,which is subject to the expiration of the prosecution period,is of great significance.However,since the introduction of the administrative procedure reopening system in the Case of Wang Jianshe,there are differences in practice,the reason for which lies in the differences in the perception of“whether the parties' application for reopening the administrative procedure is a subjective public right”.From the theory of subjective public rights and the real needs of China's judicial practice,it is appropriate to position the right to apply for reopening as a subjective public right.Based on this,in terms of specific system design,for the application of the parties to reopen,the administrative organ should be divided into two stages of formal review and substantive review,and the parties can file a lawsuit of performance or revocation according to the administrative decision;for the people s court,it should take the administrative procedure reopening decision instead of the original administrative act as the subject of trial,identify the nature of the administrative decision,and clarify the rules of court review in specific cases.

关 键 词：行政程序重开 主观公权利 行政处理程序 司法审查规则 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]