中医思维范畴下的隐喻与象思维比较研究  

Comparative research of metaphor and Xiang thinking under category of traditional Chinese medicine thinking

作　　者：李湛 贾春华 LI Zhan;JIA Chunhua(School of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,China)

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学中医学院,北京100029

出　　处：《中华中医药杂志》2023年第8期3555-3558,共4页China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(No.81874514)。

摘　　要：隐喻和象思维是中医思维研究的两种常用理论工具。在疏理二者概念与研究现状的基础上,以中医思维研究的目的为出发点,分别从理论阐释、临床指导、海内外传播三方面,对比隐喻与象思维在中医领域的价值和作用。结果发现,中医思维范畴下的隐喻与象思维结构十分相似;隐喻研究的规模更大,但中医学界对象思维的接受度更高;中医思维研究应不止于论证中医思维的独特性;含义明确、理论成熟、方法丰富的隐喻或许是用于中医思维研究的更优选择。Metaphor and Xiang thinking are two theoretical tools commonly used in the study of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)thinking.Based on sorting out the concepts and research status of both,we compared the values and functions of metaphor and Xiang thinking in TCM in terms of theoretical interpretation,clinical guidance,and dissemination at home and abroad,respectively,taking the purpose of TCM thinking research as the starting point.It is found that metaphor under the category of TCM thinking are very similar in structure to Xiang thinking;metaphors are studied on a larger scale,but the acceptance of Xiang thinking in the TCM community is higher;TCM thinking research should go beyond arguing the uniqueness of TCM thinking;metaphor with clear meanings,mature theories,and rich methods may be a better choice for TCM thinking research.

关 键 词：隐喻 象思维 中医思维 比较研究 认知科学 

分 类 号：R2-0[医药卫生—中医学]