检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张悦[1] 王晨阳 蔡立新[1] ZHANG Yue;WANG Chenyang;CAI Lixin(Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing 100070)
出 处:《经济与管理研究》2023年第8期89-108,共20页Research on Economics and Management
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“国有企业协同创新的驱动机制与效率提升研究”(21BJL115)。
摘 要:本文选取2010—2021年中国A股上市公司为样本,研究落实“能耗双控”目标对高耗能企业创新策略的影响及其后果。研究结果显示,为应对“能耗双控”目标下的环境规制要求,高耗能企业仍然主要采用技术引进的方式实现技术创新。整体上,高耗能企业会缩减自主研发投资,并加大技术引进力度,且后者是前者的格兰杰原因,技术引进对自主研发存在挤出效应。同时,坚持自主研发的企业,其经济和环境效益均显著优于依赖技术引进的企业。这说明自主研发可以在经济发展与环境保护间取得更好的平衡。进一步的研究结果显示,相较于非国有企业,国有企业受双控政策的影响程度更小;相较于经济欠发达地区,位于经济较发达地区的高耗能企业会较小程度地减少自主研发投入,技术引进投入的增加程度较大。Promoting energy conservation and emission reduction in enterprises is an essential choice to alleviate the contradiction between industrial development and environmental protection.This paper investigates the impact of the“dual control”policy—controlling energy consumption and energy intensity—on the innovation strategies of high energy-consuming enterprises in China,using a sample of A-share listed enterprises from 2010 to 2021.The main findings are as follows.First,for high energy-consuming enterprises,implementing the“dual control”policy significantly inhibits their independent research and development(R&D)investment and facilitates technology introduction.The empirical results remain valid after parallel trend tests and placebo tests.Second,the increase in technology introduction is the Granger cause for the decrease in independent R&D investment,indicating a crowding-out effect of technology introduction investment on independent R&D investment.Moreover,technology introduction reduces the motivation for independent R&D in high energy-consuming enterprises.Third,under the“dual control”policy,selecting innovation strategies for high energy-consuming enterprises has a significant impact on economic and environmental benefits.Enterprises prioritizing independent R&D witness a significant improvement in their economic and environmental benefits,indicating their ability to achieve a better equilibrium between economic growth and environmental protection.Further research shows that both state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises decrease their independent R&D,which exerts varied influences on enterprises.Compared to non-state-owned enterprises,state-owned enterprises have better access to innovation resources and are subject to stronger government regulation.Therefore,due to the“dual control”policy,state-owned enterprises will not significantly increase technology introduction or reduce investment in independent R&D,making them less affected by relevant policies.However,policy impact will be m
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38