检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡洁蔓 缪雪怡 蒋小曼 唐楚蕾 许勤[1] HU Jie-man;Miao Xue-yi;JIANG Xiao-man;TANG Chu-lei;XU Qin(School of Nursing,Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 211166,China)
出 处:《护理学报》2023年第15期29-33,共5页Journal of Nursing(China)
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(82073407);博士后基金面上资助(2022M711677);南京医科大学2021年教育研究课题重点项目(2021YJS-ZD007)。
摘 要:目的 构建社区肿瘤专科护士核心能力评价指标体系,为基层肿瘤专科护理人才的培养提供参考。方法 综合运用文献查阅法、德尔菲专家咨询法进行指标体系构建,采用层次分析法明确各级指标权重。结果 共邀请27名护理专家进行2轮函询,有效问卷回收率均为100%,专家权威系数为0.861,2轮函询Kendall协调系数分别为0.127~0.296和0.146~0.339(P<0.001),最终形成包含6项一级指标,14项二级指标,56项三级指标的社区肿瘤专科护士核心能力评价指标体系。结论 本研究构建的社区肿瘤专科护士核心能力评价指标体系科学、可靠,可为未来社区肿瘤专科护士培养、考核和评价提供理论参考。Objective To construct the core competency evaluation index system for community oncology nurses,and to provide reference for the training of grassroots oncology nurse specialists.Methods The core competency evaluation index system was constructed with literature review and Delphi method,and the analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weight of the indicators at all levels.Results Twenty-seven nursing experts were invited to conduct 2 rounds of letter inquiry.The effective questionnaire recovery rate was 100%,and the expert authority coefficient 0.861.The Kendall coefficient was 0.127~0.296.and 0.146~0.339 respectively(all P<0.001).The final evaluation system consisted of 6 first-level,14 second-level,and 56 third-level indicators.Conclusion The core competency evaluation index system for community oncology nurses is scientific and reliable,and can provide reference for the training and assessment of community oncology nurse specialists in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.224.5.46