检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈怀兵[1,2] 张云[3] 于晓明[3] 任磊[3] 郭亮[1,2] CHEN Huai-bing;ZHANG Yun;YU Xiao-ming;REN Lei;GUO Liang(Drilling&Production Engineering Technology Research Institute,CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Limited,Shaanxi Xi'an 710018;National Engineering Laboratory for Exploration and Development of Low Permeability Oil and Gas Fields,Shaanxi Xi'an 710018;No.1 Gas Production Plant of Changqing Oilfield Company,PetroChina,Shaanxi Xi'an 718500,China)
机构地区:[1]川庆钻探工程有限公司钻采工程技术研究院,陕西西安710018 [2]低渗透油气田勘探开发国家工程实验室,陕西西安710018 [3]中国石油长庆油田分公司第一采气厂,陕西靖边718500
出 处:《广州化工》2023年第10期126-129,共4页GuangZhou Chemical Industry
基 金:川庆钻探工程有限公司科技项目“苏南区块气井井筒堵塞机理及防堵解堵关键技术研究”(CQ2020B-30-3-4)。
摘 要:针对目前气井泡排剂加注制度仅凭经验制定,无法满足现场产出水的动态变化,提出基于时间序列模型的天然气井产水量预测方法,根据产水量预测结果调整泡排剂加注制度,指导现场生产。以苏南气田两口产水气井为研究对象,采用简单移动平均法、加权移动平均法、趋势移动平均法和指数平滑法进行产水量预测,依据预测数据和实际观察值的均方根误差(RMSE)、期望值绝对偏差(EVAD)和总产水量相对误差的对比,优选气井产水量预测方法,并根据预测结果优化泡排剂加注制度,并进行现场试验。结果表明:趋势移动平均法不适合气井的日产水量预测,简单移动平均法、加权移动平均法和指数平滑法能够满足气井现场产出水预测要求。对于产水量波动较大的气井,也可采用上述三种预测方法,但在预测过程中需要注意基础数据的选取。根据指数平滑法预测的气井产水量结果优化泡排剂加注制度能够显著提高气井产量,1#气井和2#气井的产气量分别提高了26.37%和28.03%。In view of the fact that the current gas well foaming agent injection system was formulated only by experience and can not meet the dynamic changes of on-site produced water,a water production prediction method of natural gas wells based on time series model was proposed.The foaming agent injection system was adjusted according to the water production prediction results to guide on-site production.Taking two water producing gas wells in Sunan gas field as the research object,the water production of gas wells was predicted by using simple moving average method,weighted moving average method,trend moving average method and exponential smoothing method.According to the comparison of root mean square error(RMSE),absolute deviation of expected value(EVAD)and relative error of total water production between predicted data and actual observation value,the water production prediction method of gas wells was optimized.According to the prediction results,the filling system of foam discharge agent was optimized,and the field test was carried out.The results showed that the trend moving average method was not suitable for the prediction of daily water production of gas wells,and the simple moving average method,weighted moving average method and exponential smoothing method could meet the requirements of field water production prediction of gas wells.For gas wells with large fluctuations in water production,the above three prediction methods could also be used,but attention should be paid to the selection of basic data in the prediction process.According to the water production of gas wells predicted by exponential smoothing method,optimizing the foam drainage agent injection system could significantly improve the production of gas wells,and the gas production of 1#gas wells and 2#gas wells were increased by 26.37%and 28.03%respectively.
关 键 词:时间序列模型 气井产水量 预测 泡排剂 加注制度
分 类 号:TE37[石油与天然气工程—油气田开发工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.236