数字经济时代网络平台的刑事归责进路  

The Criminal Accountability Approach of Network Platforms in the Digital Economy Era

作　　者：范晨 Fan Chen(North University of Technology,Beijing 100043)

机构地区：[1]北方工业大学,北京100043

出　　处：《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2023年第2期59-64,共6页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College

摘　　要：随着数字经济发展,对于网络平台的刑事归责,中立帮助理论和直接控制理论呈现一定的局限性,无法厘清网络平台的刑事责任边界。造成网络平台刑事责任边界模糊与混乱的关键原因在于我国立法和司法理论并没有重视对其予以类型化区分。以网络平台的技术手段为标准,将其划分为内容提供平台、接入服务提供平台、缓存服务提供平台、储存服务提供平台,其中内容提供平台应承担“主动审查义务”,网络储存或缓存平台适用“通知+删除”规则,网络接入服务平台则“不承担事前审查义务”,归责力度逐级递减,从而实现对网络平台归责的教义学限缩。With the development of the digital economy,the neutral assistance theory and direct control theory have shown certain limitations in the criminal liability of online plaforms,making it difficult to clarify the criminal liability boundaries of online platforms.The key reason for the blurring and confusion of criminal liability boundaries on online platforms is that China's legislative and judicial theories do not attach importance to categorizing them.Based on the technical means of network platforms,they are divided into content providing platforms,access service providing platforms,cache service providing platforms,and storage service providing platforms.The content providing platform should bear the"active review obligation",the network storage or cache platform should apply the"notification+deletion"rule,while the network access service platform has"no obligation of the review in advance",and the degree of attribution should gradually decrease,thus achieving a doctrinal limitation on the accountability of online platforms.

关 键 词：网络平台犯罪 中立行为 技术控制 平台类型化 

分 类 号：DF61[政治法律—刑法学]