检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:古瑞华 周心怡 GU Ruihua;ZHOU Xinyi(School of Law and Sociology,Xinyang Normal University,Xinyang 464000,China;College of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
机构地区:[1]信阳师范大学法学与社会学学院,河南信阳464000 [2]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088
出 处:《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2023年第5期26-31,40,共7页Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:北京市社会科学基金规划项目(21FXB009)。
摘 要:近年来,网络犯罪及其帮助行为发生异化,相关司法解释随之发布施行。在此背景下,网络犯罪主体日趋“平民化”,立法执法系统呈现“松绑化”,帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪的司法适用大幅扩张。这不符合刑法理论的内在逻辑,也无法回应司法实践的需求。对此,应该强化“明知”的罪责自负属性以及被帮助行为的严格构罪属性,对本罪的司法适用进行限缩。In recent years,cybercrime and its facilitation have become alienated,and relevant judicial interpretations have been issued and implemented.In this context,the subject of cybercrime is becoming more and more“civilian”,and the legislative law enforcement system is“loosened”,which has helped greatly expand the judicial application of information network criminal activities.This does not conform to the internal logic of criminal law theory and cannot respond to the needs of judicial practice.In this regard,the self-responsibility attribute of“knowing”and the strictly constructed nature of the assisted act should be strengthened,and the judicial application of this crime should be limited.
关 键 词:帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 帮助行为正犯化 明知 中立行为
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.94