论影响量刑轻重的司法经验——以故意杀人案件中的量刑经验事实为分析对象  

On Judicial Experience Affecting the Degree of Sentencing--Taking Empirical Facts in Intentional Homicide Cases as Analysis Object

作　　者：蒋涤非 JIANG Difei(The Peoples'Procurotarate of Yunnan Province,Kunming Yunan 650228,China)

机构地区：[1]云南省人民检察院,云南昆明650228

出　　处：《河南警察学院学报》2023年第3期99-106,共8页Journal of Henan Police College

摘　　要：司法经验是司法者在长期司法实践中总结出来的、辅助司法判断的个性化知识。有经验的司法者与没有经验的司法者相比,前者对司法活动中的经验事实更为关注,能够基于经验事实形成个性知识仓库。经验事实不是构成要件事实,也不是量刑规范化文件中被设定的规范量刑事实,而是随附事实。在故意杀人案件中,较为常见可以影响量刑轻重判断的经验事实有:案发时间地点,尸体处理方式,社会惊扰程度,致死手段的残忍程度,灭门绝嗣等。经验事实有三个特征:一是描述法益侵害程度,二是反映行为人主观恶性程度,三是与伦理善恶判断相关。Judicial experience is the personalized knowledge summarized by the judiciary to help with judicial judgment in the long-term judicial practice.Compared with the inexperienced judicial personnel,the experienced judicial personnel pay more attention to the experience facts in judicial activities and are better at guessing,and form a personal knowledge warehouse based on the facts.The empirical fact is neither a constituent fact,nor a standardized sentencing fact set in the sentencing standardization document,but an accompanying fact.In intentional homicide cases,the common empirical facts that can affect the judgment of sentencing severity are:the time and place of the crime,the way the body was disposed of,the degree of social disturbance,the cruelty of the means of death,the extermination of the family,etc.The empirical facts have 3 characteristics:one is to describe the degree of infringement of legal interests,the second is to reflect the subjective malignancy of the actor,and the third is related to the ethical judgment of good and evil.

关 键 词：故意杀人 司法经验 经验事实 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]