简论元好问与严羽论诗观的相似点  

A Brief Discussion on the Similarities Between Yuan Haowen's and Yan Yu's Poetics

作　　者： Chen Junjie

机构地区：[1]复旦大学古籍整理研究所(中国古代文学研究中心)

出　　处：《理论界》2023年第8期83-89,共7页Theory Horizon

摘　　要：元好问《论诗三十首》以及严羽《沧浪诗话》是宋金之际的重要诗歌评论之作。以此为研究对象进行考察发现,元、严的论诗观存在高度的相似之处。就艺术风格而言,二人重视以“建安风骨”为代表的“刚健”之气,注重以东晋陶渊明为代表的“自然”之风,反对“柔弱”“新奇”之弊。就写作技巧而言,二人均推崇简练、平易之笔,反对隐晦、难解之作,主张“自然声律”。就创作内容而言,二人都推崇真实之情,反对矫揉造作的“次韵”之体,指出诗歌应该具有抒情言志、反映社会现实等“兴寄”内容,反对以“骂詈”之言入诗。Yuan Haowen's Thirty Poems and Yan Yu's Canglang Shihua are critical poetry reviews oftthe Song and JinDynasties,which,as the subjecot f this study,have shown a high degree ofsimilarity intheir views on poety.In terms of artistic style,they emphasizedthe"robust"style represented bythe"Jian'an literature"and the"natural""style representedbyTao Yuanming of the Eastern Jin Dynasty while opposing the"weak"and"exotic"styles.As for writing techniques,bothof themnpromoted concise and plain poems and opposedobscure and ambiguous compositions.Moreover,they also advocated theso-called"natural rhythm".Regardingcontent,bothof themadmired the genuine and sincere content and opposed the artificial"replying rhyme"works,that is,replying to poems with the same rhyme.Theypointedoutthat tpoetry shouldbelyrical and use inner sustenance to reflect SOcial realityandothercontents,but that it was opposedtothe use of"verbal abusiveness"in poetry.

关 键 词：严羽 元好问 沧浪诗话 论诗三十首 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]