从一元到多元:美国女性学学科发展叙事主体的变迁  

From Monism to Pluralism:The Evolution of Narrative Subject in the Disciplinary Development of American Women's Studies

作　　者：魏开琼[1] 李佳莲 WEI Kai-qiong;LI Jia-lian(School of Women's Development,China Women's University,Beijing 100101,China)

机构地区：[1]中华女子学院妇女发展学院,北京100101 [2]中华女子学院性别与哲学研究中心,北京100101

出　　处：《山西师大学报（社会科学版）》2023年第5期88-94,共7页Journal of Shanxi Normal University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(21&ZD060)。

摘　　要：美国女性学长期由中产阶级精英白人女性占据主导地位,导致美国女性学叙事主体单一且边缘化了其他女性群体。梳理近20年来美国正式出版的女性学学科历程的文献发现,有色人种女性以及其他妇女群体对美国女性学建设也作出了重要贡献。尤其是探讨性别与种族交叉影响的黑人女性主义,极大地丰富了美国女性学的学科内涵。美国女性学学科发展从不断变化的命名、“交叉性”概念的形成,到由“姐妹情谊”向“姐妹差异”的转变,折射出重构后的女性学学科样貌。美国女性学的发展历程也启示我们,中国女性学应将自我叙事置于全球化和区域化的背景之下,以参与亚洲女性学学科建设,建构中国的女性学话语体系。Long dominated by white middle⁃class elite women,American women's studies presents a single narrative that marginalizes minority women.However,after sorting out the published literature on the history of A⁃merican women's studies over the past two decades,this article finds the significant contribution made by colored women and other female minority groups to the discipline.In particular,black women have employed black femi⁃nism which explored the intersectional influence of gender and race to enrich the disciplinary connotation.American women's studies reconstructed its disciplinary framework through the change of terminology,the formation of inter⁃sectionality,and a transition from“sisterhood”to“sister's differences”.The developmental trajectory of American women's studies inspires Chinese women's studies to position its individual narratives within the context of globaliza⁃tion and regionalization,participate in the construction of Asian women's studies and establish its own discourse sys⁃tem.

关 键 词：美国女性学 交叉性 学科建设 

分 类 号：C913.68[经济管理]