检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许译文 XU Yiwen(Law School,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871
出 处:《法学论坛》2023年第5期150-160,共11页Legal Forum
摘 要:《刑事诉讼法》第117条确立的检察机关就当事人所提出的公安机关违法实施强制性侦查措施的申诉进行检察监督的机制,是一种行政性审查模式,该模式存在滞后性强、审查方式书面化、申诉者的程序参与权极为有限以及制裁机制缺位等问题。对此,有必要建立强制性侦查措施检察监督的诉讼化审查机制,从检察机关的审查主体、审查程序以及制裁机制入手,实现对强制性侦查措施的有效法律规制与法律监督。The procuratorial supervision of compulsory investigation measures established in Article 117 of the Criminal Procedure Law is an administrative examiation mode,which has many problems,such as strong lag,written examination method,lack of the complainant's right to participate in the procedure and the absence of sanctions mechanism.Also,the right of the complainant to participate in the procedure can't be guaranteed.In this regard,it is necessary to establish a litigation review mechanism for the procuratorial supervision of compulsory investigation measures,starting with the review subject,review procedure and sanction mechanism of the procuratorial organ,to achieve effective legal regulation and legal supervision of compulsory investigation measures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.170.100