文权“复归台阁”:晚明文学史研究的重要议题  

Literary Writing’s“Returning to Literary Style of the Officials”:An Important Subject of Literary History in the Late Ming Dynasty

作　　者：薛泉 XUE Quan(School of Arts,Shandong Normal University,Jinan 250014,China)

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学文学院,山东济南250014

出　　处：《河北学刊》2023年第5期91-99,共9页Hebei Academic Journal

基　　金：2014年度国家社会科学基金一般项目“明代郎署官与文学权力之关系研究”(14BZW064)。

摘　　要：从现存文献看,晚明较早提及文权“复归台阁”说者,当为后七子盟主王世贞,时间在明万历十四年至十八年(1586—1590)间。此说提出后,得到馆阁文人的热烈呼应。所谓文权“复归台阁”,并非再现“三杨”时期的台阁文学气象,而是一种有限度的复兴,是晚明特定时代背景下馆阁文人鸣盛心态在文学上的集中折射。这颇得益于馆阁文学的郎署化倾向,以及嘉靖末年以降馆选的正常化、制度化。文权“复归台阁”,在削弱后七子郎署文学权力的同时,也加速了晚明文学权力的分化。从某种意义上说,文权“复归台阁”为观察晚明文学的发展演化提供了一个相对别致的窗口,是晚明文学史研究的重要议题。From the existing literature,the person who mentioned the theory of“returning to literary style of the officials”in the late Ming dynasty was Wang Shizhen from 1586 to 1590.It is a limited revival and a concentrated reflection of the literary mentality of the literati in the late Ming dynasty under the specific background.This is largely due to the literary style towards the officials and the normalization and institutionalization of imperial examination for selecting officials since the end of the Jiajing reign.This weakened the literary power of the Latter Seven Masters,and also accelerated the differentiation of literary power in the late Ming dynasty.In a sense,the return to the literary style of the officials provides a relatively unique window for observing the development and evolution of the late Ming literature,and is also an important subject of the study in literary history in the late Ming dynasty.

关 键 词：文学权力 复归台阁 郎署化 馆选 

分 类 号：I209[文学—中国文学]