检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:奚哲涵 朱正宇 Xi Zhehan;Zhu Zhengyu(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088;Yingke(Wuhu)Law Firm,Wuhu Anhui 241000)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学,北京100088 [2]北京盈科(芜湖)律师事务所,安徽芜湖241000
出 处:《安徽警官职业学院学报》2023年第2期1-4,共4页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
摘 要:律师—委托人特免权的理论基础先后经历了荣誉说、功利主义理论和隐私权理论。在制度层面,我国法律规定的以辩护律师为权利主体的律师特免权与律师负有保护委托人隐私权的义务存在矛盾。当前辩护律师特免权制度造成了事实上限制委托人变更律师的权利以及律师辅助人员不受特免权保护等困境。将辩护律师特免权变革为以委托人为权利主体的律师—委托人特免权,可以有效化解律师—委托人特免权产生的制度困境。The theoretical basis of attorney-client privilege has successively experienced honor theory,utilitarian theory and privacy theory.According to Chinese law,there is an institutional contradiction between attorneys’privilege,which subject is attorney,and the obligation of attorneys to protect the privacy of clients.The current system of privilege for attorneys has created difficulties such as de facto restrictions on the right of parties to change their attorneys and auxiliary attorneys’protection from privilege.Transforming the privilege of attorneys into the attorney-client privilege with the client as the subject of rights can effectively resolve the institutional dilemma arising from the attorney-client privilege system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7