“双向交流”下利用未公开信息交易共同犯罪的认定——以姜某君、柳某利用未公开信息交易案为视角  

The Identification of Joint Crimes in Using Undisclosed Information for Trading under"Two⁃way Communication"

作　　者：顾佳 杨媛媛 GU Jia;YANG Yuanyuan(The First Branch of Shanghai People′s Procuratorate,Shanghai 200050)

机构地区：[1]上海市人民检察院第一分院第三检察部

出　　处：《犯罪研究》2023年第3期107-112,共6页Chinese Criminology Review

摘　　要：关注金融机构和非金融机构工作人员“双向交流”型利用未公开信息交易案,厘清此类案件共同犯罪的结构和本质,对于司法机关准确辨识金融机构内外人员正常合作抑或恶意勾结,防止合作关系异变,精准打击共同犯罪具有极为重要的意义。其中,需要特别审查双方信息的流向、内容、方式以及意图,重点把握双方利益共同体的形成过程。利用未公开信息交易罪是身份犯,鉴于身份和职务内容的差异,金融机构工作人员成立间接正犯,非金融机构工作人员成立共同正犯。在犯罪数额的认定上,应秉持刑法谦抑原则,视“正向传递”与“反向传递”未公开信息的具体情况进行认定。It is of great significance to draw attention to the"two⁃way communication"type of transactions involving the use of undisclosed information by staff of financial institutions and non⁃financial institutions,and clarify the structure and nature of joint crimes in such cases,for judicial authorities to accurately identify whether personnel inside and outside financial institutions cooperate normally or maliciously,prevent changes in cooperative relationships,and accurately combat joint crimes.In particular,it is necessary to review the flow,content,method,and intent of information from both parties,with a focus on grasping the formation process of a community of interests between both parties.The crime of using undisclosed information for trading is an identity crime.Due to the differences in identity and job content,financial institution staff become indirect principal offenders,while non⁃financial institution staff become joint principal offenders.In determining the amount of crime,the principle of modesty and restraint in criminal law should be upheld,and the specific circumstances of"forward transmission"and"reverse transmission"of non⁃public information should be considered.

关 键 词：利用未公开信息交易罪 双向交流 共同犯罪 司法认定 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]