宫崎骏动画之历史观探赜  

Research into Hayao Miyazaki’s Historical View of Animations

作　　者：杨晓林[1] YANG Xiaoin(Film Research Institute,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China)

机构地区：[1]同济大学电影研究所,上海200092

出　　处：《上海大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第5期57-67,共11页Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA333)。

摘　　要：宫崎骏的文明轮回史观赓续史学家斯宾格勒的历史悲观论和阿诺德·汤因比的文化形态史观,青蓝相继,更上层楼;他秉承技术批判史观,与科学家爱因斯坦,思想家和哲学家马克思、恩格斯、海德格尔、哈贝马斯等对技术批判的主张异曲同工。他认为高科技战争是人类毁灭、文明轮回的推手和元凶巨恶;他的英雄史观与史学家汤因比和梁启超的英雄史观、卡莱尔的伟人史观及思想家尼采的超人史观等可谓同调。宫崎骏犀燃烛照,感慨颇深,一变“杂耍”娱乐商业动画而为史学家和思想家动画,其醒世警世救世之思,足可与当代伟大的思想家们相颉颃,对中国动画的科技史观、英雄史观、文明史观及生态动画创作极具启示意义。Hayao Miyazaki’s“historical view of civilization reincarnation”carries forward historian Spengler’s“historical pessimism”and Toynbee’s“historical view of cultural forms”,even reaching a higher level.Miyazaki adopts a techno-critical view of history,which is similar to that of scientist Albert Einstein and that embraced by such thinkers and philosophers as Marx,Engels,Heidegger and Habermas.He believes that high-tech warfare is the driving force and culprit of the destruction of human beings and civilization reincarnation.The“heroic view of history”he holds,is in line with that of historians Toynbee and Liang Qichao,“great man view of history”held by Carlyle,and“Superman view of history”held by Nietzsche,a great thinker.Abandoning commercial animation,Miyazaki produces animation from the perspective of a historian and thinker.His makes his thoughts into films attempting to wake up,warn and save the world by hewing out a most difficult and challenging new path,which puts him on a par with great thinkers of our time.It is of great significance for Chinese historical view of science and technology,of heroes,and of civilization as well as Chinese creation of ecological animation.

关 键 词：宫崎骏动画 文明轮回 科技异化 英雄史观 

分 类 号：J0[艺术—艺术理论]