论在线诉讼异步审理模式  

Research on Asynchronous Trial Mode of Online Litigation

作　　者：杨雅妮[1] 肖瑾智 YANG Ya-ni;XIAO Jin-zhi

机构地区：[1]兰州大学法学院

出　　处：《江苏警官学院学报》2023年第4期52-60,共9页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute

基　　金：2021年度国家社科基金西部项目“检察机关办理公益诉讼案件民行刑衔接机制研究”(21XFX015);兰州大学法学院研究生科研创新项目“在线诉讼异步审理模式研究”(202221023);2022年度兰州大学“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金”定向探索项目“网络个人信息保护公益诉讼研究”(22lzujbkyxs022)。

摘　　要：异步审理模式自创立以来适用范围逐步扩大,但其制度功能尚未有效发挥:规范上,现有规范效力位阶低、内容不统一、可操作性不强的局限性明显;实践上,适用范围严格受限、当事人程序选择权过于膨胀、审判公开制度贯彻落实受阻以及冒名诉讼等问题凸显。学界也因该模式违反直接言词原则、集中审理原则以及背离法庭仪式感而争议不断。在此背景下,应在明确异步审理模式独特价值及法理依据的基础上,从扩大适用范围、限制当事人程序选择权、强化审判公开、防范当事人身份冒用以及探索建立“调辩合一+要素式审判”审理方式等方面对异步审理模式进行优化完善。The application scope of asynchronous trial mode has gradually expanded since its establishment,but its system function has not been effectively played:in terms of norms,the existing norms have obvious limitations such as low validity level,inconsistent content and weak operability.In practice,the scope of application is strictly limited,the procedural choice of the parties is too expanded,the implementation of the trial public system is blocked,and other problems are prominent.The academic circles have also been disputing that this model violates the principle of direct speech,the principle of centralized trial and the sense of court ceremony.In this context,on the basis of clarifying the unique value and legal basis of asynchronous trial mode,the asynchronous trial mode should be optimized and improved from the aspects of expanding the scope of application,limiting the procedural choice of the parties,strengthening the trial openness,preventing the identity of the parties and exploring the establishment of the trial mode of"integration of mediation and argument plus factor trial".

关 键 词：异步审理模式 直接言词原则 审判公开 要素式审判 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]