检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:童德华[1] 杨小雨 TONG Dehua;YANG Xiaoyu(Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan Hubei 430000,China)
出 处:《山西警察学院学报》2023年第5期35-41,共7页Journal of Shanxi Police College
摘 要:我国司法实践对于开设赌场罪的认定仅停留在形式层面,仅以行为人是否单独或结伙开设一个场所用于赌博活动为判断标准。如是,则成立开设赌场罪;如否,则成立聚众赌博型赌博罪。实质上,赌场以其企业化的经营模式为核心特征,主要包括持续盈利、稳定发展、秩序破坏三个方面。而聚众赌博型赌博罪中的赌博场所则无须达到上述标准。这一定义既未提高开设赌场罪的入罪门槛,也不违背罪刑法定原则。In China,that running a casino for gambling by oneself or with others is considered as a judging standard for whether it is the crime of running a casino or the crime of organizing gambling parties.This standard just stays on the surface level in judicial practices.In fact,casinos are mostly characterized by their commercial basis,mainly with the following three features:making profit sustainably,developing steadily and disturbing orders.However,for crime of organizing gambling parties,it's unnecessary for the gambling houses to bear the above features,which neither raises the incrimination threshold for the crime of running a casino nor violates the principle of legality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7