走向“阐诠学”:公共阐释视野下的本体诠释  

Towards"Changuan Xue":Ontological Interpretation in the Perspective of Public Hermeneutics

作　　者：朱军 Zhu Jun

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学人文学院,上海200234

出　　处：《中国文学批评》2023年第3期44-52,189,190,共11页Chinese Journal of Literary Criticism

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“近现代‘中国文艺复兴’话语考论”(21BZW060)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：公共阐释论对伽达默尔最重要的质疑在于:理解是否即为阐释?理解之为本体并非从语言中返回自身就能得到阐明,而需首先明确道的综合体验性质。“阐诠学”综合了“理”“性”“情”层面的本体论辨析与“阐”“诠”“释”等方法论层面的探究,呈现为公共阐释论视野下的体用一体,中西哲学与美学的差异不只体现为本体概念的差异,同时也有对本体理解的进路的差异,由此方可达成东方智慧与西方理性的互补、借鉴与相融。公共阐释论回到传统理性之辨,提供重估现代美学“性一情”到“情一性”架构之转折的契机,为揭示、阐释与反思情本体的构造及其多重论争提供了重要的依据。对于“美学作为第一哲学”这一命题,从理性辨到情本体的探问具有正本清源的意义。The most important question that public hermeneutics poses to Gadamer is:whether understanding is interpretation.Understanding is not an ontology that can be elucidated by returning from language to itself,but by first clarifying the comprehensive experiential nature of Dao."Chanquan rue"combines the ontological analysis of"reason,""nature"and"emotion"with the methodological inquiry of"exposition,","interpretation"and"explanation,"presenting the unity of ontology and function under public hermeneutic perspective,the difference between Chinese and Western philosophy and aesthetics is no longer only a difference in the concept of ontology,but also a difference in the approach to understanding ontology.In this way,we can achieve complementarity,borrowing and integration between Eastern wisdom and Western reason.

关 键 词：“阐诠学” 公共阐释论 本体诠释 理性辩 情本体 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]