检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖登辉[1] 黄菊 XIAO Deng-hui;HUANG Ju(School of Law,Central China Normal University,Wuhan Hubei 430079,China)
出 处:《廊坊师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2023年第3期102-108,共7页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:教育法法典化的主要目的是追求教育立法的体系化、规范化和科学化。编纂教育法法典无论是对于教育法学理论研究,还是对于教育法治实践,都具有重要意义,有助于以法治方式深入推进教育制度的改革创新,提高教育质量,实现教育现代化。教育法典编纂的立法模式主要有三种:以法国为代表的体系模式,以日本为代表的“基本法+单行法”的综合模式以及以美国为代表的汇编模式。我国教育法典的编纂可以在以上三种模式中有选择性地进行借鉴,在架构模式上运用“体系式”,在立法体例上采用“总则+分则”的方式,在规范设置上则采用“三位一体”的形式。The codification of education law can strengthen the systematization,standardization and scientization of education legislation.The compilation of educational code is of great significance both for the theoretical research of educational law and for the practice of the rule of law in education.It is helpful to promote the reform and innovation of the educational system in the way of the rule of law,improve the quality of education and realize the modernization of education.At present,there are three main legislative models for the compilation of the education code:the systematic code model represented by France,the comprehensive model of“basic law+separate law”represented by Japan and the compilation model represented by the US.The compilation of China’s education code can be selectively used for reference in the above three models,using“systematic”in the model,“general principles+specific principles”in the legislative style,and“trinity”in the standard setting.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28