网络文学评价:体系与标准  

Evaluation on Network Literature:System and Standard

作　　者：欧阳友权[1] OUYANG You-quan(School of Humanities,Central South University,Changsha 410083,China)

机构地区：[1]中南大学人文学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《贵州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第5期1-11,共11页Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“我国网络文学评价体系的理论与实践研究”(16ZDA193)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在网络文学理论批评语境中,“评价体系”与“批评标准”常常连用、换用和混用,实际上这两个概念能指与所指的内涵、外延和关系属性是存在话语别异的。体系的要素构成和指标设定共同塑造了网络文学评价体系的学理形态。由“文学”和“网络文学”限定的思想性、艺术性、网生性、产业性和影响力等批评标准,有着切近对象本体的逻辑内生性;而标准与标准应用的普遍性与特殊性、规定性与可塑性、确定性与不确定性,则规制了各项标准在网络文学批评实践中的辩证选择。In the context of theoretical criticism of network literature,“evaluation system”and“critical criteria”are often used together,interchangeably and in the mixed way.In fact,there are discursive differences between the two concepts in terms of connotation,denotation and relation attributes of their referent and signifier.The elements of the system and the setting of indicators jointly shape the theoretical form of the network literature evaluation system.The critical criteria,which are defined by“literature”and“network literature”,such as ideological,artistic,network nature,industrial nature and influence,have logical endogeneity close to the object ontology.The universality and particularity,prescriptivity and plasticity,certainty and uncertainty of the criteria and their application regulate the dialectical selection of criteria in the practice of network literary criticism.

关 键 词：网络文学评价 评价体系 批评标准 学理形态 逻辑生成 

分 类 号：I106[文学—世界文学]