检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭欣悦 PENG Xinyue(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学,北京100088
出 处:《北京警察学院学报》2023年第4期23-31,共9页Journal of Beijing Police College
摘 要:刑事合规背景下,存在“严惩责任人”与“放过责任人”之间的内在张力。事实上,基于民营企业尤其是小微企业持续稳定运营的价值分析,单位犯罪归责理论的检视证成以及域外司法实践的有益参考,刑事合规单位责任人出罪具有进一步思考的法理逻辑。出罪路径方面,应以再次犯罪危险显著降低为前提,以责任人在合规中的重要作用为依据,并基于类型化思维,对公司治理结构完善的企业,考虑单位责任人的实质作用;对于公司治理结构失范的企业,则充分结合认罪认罚从宽制度、相对不起诉制度等,扩大从宽幅度。In the context of criminal compliance,there is an inherent tension between"severely punishing liable person"and"letting go of liable person".In fact,based on the value analysis of the sustainable and stable operation of private enterprises,especially small enterprises,the justification of the theory of liability for unit crimes,and referring to the extraterritorial judicial practice,there is a space for for denying the accusation of the liable person in the unit in criminal compliance.As for the decriminalization path,it should be based on effective reduction of the risk of recidivism,as well as the the important role of the liable person in compliance.Moreover,typed thinking patterns is necessary,in the case of enterprises with sound corporate governance structure,we should consider the substantive role of liable person;in the case of enterprises with improper corporate governance structure,we should fully consider the system of leniency for guilty pleas and punishment acceptance and the relative non-prosecution system,and expand the extent of leniency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.128.203.120