自力行使财产权的刑法评价路径  

Reviewing Criminal Regulation of the Exercise of Civil Rights

作　　者：罗雨荔 LUO Yuli(School of Law,Tsinghua Universtiy,Beijing,100084)

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084

出　　处：《中国刑警学院学报》2023年第3期5-14,共10页Journal of Criminal Investigation Police University of China

摘　　要：为达公正与效率的平衡,私力救济应被视为公力救济的合理补充。对于自力行权案件的处理,刑法应保持谦抑,为私力救济功能的发挥提供土壤,但这应以公平与个人更高位阶法益的保护为底线。相比以违法性为中心的权利行使案件处理模式,我国传统通说所采取的以构成要件为中心的处理模式更具合理性。具体案件处理上,应通过是否存在财产损失、是否可以援引《民法典》自助行为阻却违法、有无非法占有目的及故意等的判断,多阶层配合地划定出合理的处罚范围。To balance justice and efficiency,private relief should regard a reasonable supplement to public protections.For the cases of exercising civil rights,the criminal law should intervene less.However,this should be based on fairness and the protection of personal higher-level interests.It is more reasonable to focus on the actus reus than on the defense.Several key points of dealing with the case should be considered including whether there is property loss,whether the self-helping of the civil code can be invoked,and whether it has the required subjectivepurpose.

关 键 词：私力救济禁止 违法阻却事由 自助行为 财产犯罪 财产损失 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]