检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:封磊 FENG Lei(School of History,Yan’an University,Yan’an 716000)
出 处:《工会理论研究》2023年第5期53-66,共14页Labour Union Studies
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“时间的全球变革与近代中国社会转型研究”(项目编号:22YJC770005);延安大学博士科研项目(项目编号:YDBK2019-39);延安市科技专项资金资助项目(项目编号:2019-15)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:学界对新形势下工时形态的研究渐成热点,但对作为新工时基础的八小时制在近代的认知形态与实施情况的研究还有待完善。本研究首先重点考察八小时标准工时在近代中国的认知形态,其次以民国时期天津宝成纱厂改行三八制为典型案例,论析实践八小时制的具体过程,最后从作为社会文化事件的宝成纱厂改行三八制的失败之因,近代中国八小时制法制实践的差异性,以及作为政治文化遗产的“五一”等三个层面论析八小时制的全球价值。Research on the working hour pattern in the new situation has become a hot topic,but the eight-hour system,which is the basis of the new working hour,has not yet been studied in terms of its cognitive pattern and implementation in modern China in general.Under the perspective of global history,this study firstly focuses on the cognitive form of the eight-hour standard working hours in modern China,then takes the conversion of Baocheng Yarn Factory to the eight-hour system as a typical case in the Republic of China,and analyzes the specific process of practicing the eight-hour system.Finally the article analyzes the reasons for the failure of Baocheng Yarn Factory to implement the Three-eight hour system as a social and cultural event,the particularity of the legal practice of the eight-hour system in modern China,and the“May Day”as a political and cultural heritage.
分 类 号:F249.292.1[经济管理—劳动经济]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.250.2