检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:惠立良 王成果 段东峰 王健 Hui Liliang;Wang Chengguo;Duan Dongfeng;Wang Jian(Department of General Surgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University,Xi’an Shaanxi Province 710038,China)
机构地区:[1]空军军医大学第二附属医院普外科,西安710038
出 处:《中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)》2023年第5期558-561,共4页Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition)
基 金:陕西省重点研发计划(2018F-154)。
摘 要:目的:探究离断脾血管而保留胃短血管的胰体尾切除术(Warshaw法)和保留脾动静脉的胰体尾切除术(Kimura法)对胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤的临床应用效果。方法:回顾性分析2015年1月至2018年10月收治的60例因胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤行腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除术患者的临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为Kimura组(行Kimura法胰体尾切除术,n=34)和Warshaw组(行Warshaw法胰体尾切除术,n=26)。应用软件SPSS 23.0进行数据分析,术后并发症以[例(%)]表示,组间比较采用χ^(2)检验;围手术期指标等计量资料用(^(-)x±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:Kimura组患者术中出血量多于Warshaw组(P<0.05),但两组患者手术时间、术后肛门通气时间和住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);Kimura组患者并发症总发生率低于Warshaw组(5.9%vs.34.6%,P<0.05);术后随访两组患者均无肿瘤复发及胃静脉曲张破裂出血发生。结论:腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术应用于治疗胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤近远期效果优良。与Warshaw法相比,Kimura法出血量虽多,但有利于脾脏血供及功能保护,术后并发症更低,具有一定优势,值得在临床推广应用。Objective To investigate the clinical effects of Warshaw and Kimura resection of splenic arterio-venous resection in the treatment of benign and borderline pancreatic tumors.Methods Clinical data of 60 patients treated from January 2015 to October 2018 who underwent laparoscopic caudectomy due to benign pancreatic body and tail tumors and some borderline tumors were retrospectively selected and divided into Kimura group according to different surgical methods(Kimura method caudectomy,n=34 cases)and Warshaw group(Warshaw coyotectomy,n=26 cases).SPSS 23.0 software was used for data analysis.Postoperative complications were represented as[cases(%)],andχ^(2)test was used for comparison between groups.Measurement data such as perioperative indicators were represented by(^(-)x±s),and independent sample t test was used.P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results The amount of intraoperative blood loss in Kimura group was higher than that in Warshaw group(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in operative time,postoperative anal ventilation time and hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05).The total complication rate in Kimura group was lower than that in Warshaw group(5.9%vs.34.6%,P<0.05).No tumor recurrence or gastric varicose bleeding occurred in both groups during postoperative follow-up.Conclusion Laparoscopic splenic-preserving pancreato-caudal resection is effective in the treatment of benign tumors and some borderline tumors.Compared with Warshaw method,Kimura method has more blood loss,but it is beneficial to spleen blood supply and functional protection,and has lower postoperative complications,which has certain advantages and is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.141.193