检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈梦 郑培玲 CHEN Meng;ZHENG Peiling(Henan Earthquake Agency,Zhengzhou 450018,China)
机构地区:[1]河南省地震局,郑州450018
出 处:《地震地磁观测与研究》2023年第3期102-106,共5页Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research
摘 要:利用2020年1—5月期间河南省地震构造探查工程项目实施的9次人工爆破资料,来检验“2015河南模型”和“华南模型”在河南地震台网的地震定位效果以及M_(S)DP地震分析软件中单纯型、Hyposat和LocSAT3种地震定位方法的精度。结果显示,“2015河南模型”地震定位震中偏差较“华南模型”小,基于“2015河南模型”对比以上3种定位方法给出的定位结果,单纯型定位法计算的震中位置与实际爆破位置偏差最小。综合分析认为,在日常地震速报和编目工作中,“2015河南模型”配合单纯型定位法可作为河南地震台网地震定位的首选方法。Using 9 artificial blasting earthquakes from the seismic structure exploration project in Henan Province from January to May 2020,the earthquake location effect of the“2015 Henan Model”and the“South China Model”in Henan Earthquake Networks were tested,as well as the precision of 3 earthquake location methods such as Simple,Hyposat,and LocSAT in the MSDP seismic analysis software.The results show that the epicenter deviation of the“2015 Henan Model”earthquake location is less than that of the“South China Model”.Based on the comparison of the location results given by the above three location methods using the“2015 Henan Model”,the epicenter location calculated by the simple method has the smallest deviation from the actual blasting location.Comprehensive analys is shows that the“2015 Henan Model”combined with the simple method can be used for earthquake location in Henan Earthquake Networks in daily earthquake rapid reporting and cataloging work.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49