缺失与建构:认罪认罚中裁量不起诉决定的程序效力  

Missing and Reconstruction:The"Leniency"determining power of procuratorial discretion in pleading guilty and punishment

作　　者：张靖雪 Zhang Jingxue(Southwest University of Political Science&Law,Chongqing 401120)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学证据法学研究中心,重庆401120

出　　处：《重庆社会科学》2023年第9期94-110,共17页Chongqing Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“刑事案件事实认定中的经验法则研究”(19BFX092);最高人民检察院检察理论研究一般课题“认罪认罚后被告人反悔研究”(GJ2019C30)。

摘　　要：检察主导背景下,认罪认罚案件的定罪量刑实质性前移至审查起诉阶段,导致被追诉人可能受到的恣意追诉的危险也随之提前。此阶段的检察裁量权以裁量不起诉为主要形式,承载着被追诉人在实体或程序层面的从宽诉讼利益,但其因程序效力的缺失而无法束缚检察主体,造成检察裁量权不受约束地扩张。要实现裁量不起诉决定程序效力的建构,应从重新审视刑事重复追诉危险的实质性标准、强化合意制度下纠纷解决价值、优化检察裁量决定的独立属性多方面着手,考虑规定裁量不起诉决定具有“类”既判力,以保障检察权力的合理主导,规制审前阶段可能存在的恣意追诉危险。under the background of procuratorial led litigation,the conviction and sentencing of guilty and punishment cases move substantially forward to the stage of review and prosecution,resulting in the risk of repetition or aggravation of prosecution that the accused may suffer.In the form of non prosecution decision or sentencing suggestion,the procuratorial discretion decision carries the"lenient"litigation interests of the accused at the substantive or procedural level.However,due to the lack of certainty of"Leniency",it can not restrain the procuratorial subject,resulting in the breach of contract such as the procuratorial organ unilaterally changing the signing agreement and arbitrarily changing the complaint opinion.To realize the reconstruction of the certainty of"Leniency"of procuratorial discretion,we should re-examine the substantive standard of the risk of criminal repeated prosecution,strengthen the value of dispute resolution under the consensual system,optimize the independent attribute of pre-trial decision,and apply the"class"res judicata of procuratorial discretion,so as to ensure the reasonable leadership of procuratorial power,Regulate the possible risk of arbitrary prosecution in the pre-trial stage.

关 键 词：认罪认罚制度 裁量不起诉决定 程序效力 重复追诉 人权保障 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]