检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李志 谢云东[1] Zhi Li;Yundong Xie(International Institute of Finance,School of Management,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230601,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学技术大学管理学院国际金融研究院,安徽合肥230601
出 处:《中国科学技术大学学报》2023年第8期32-40,I0001,I0002,共11页JUSTC
基 金:supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(WK2040000045,WK2040000046);Anhui Province Postdoctoral Research Funding Project(2021B542)。
摘 要:近年来,新能源汽车补贴政策推动了我国新能源汽车产业的蓬勃发展。过往研究倾向于关注消费者对新能源汽车补贴政策的反应,而对投资者反应的关注相对匮乏,尤其是在重大突发公共事件背景下。本文基于事件研究法,实证检验了COVID-19疫情背景下新能源汽车企业投资者对我国新能源汽车退坡补贴方案的响应模式,并探讨了不同企业属性下(即是否在上海证券交易所上市、是否位于一线城市、是否属于国有企业、是否属于新能源汽车行业上游企业)的投资者响应差异。研究结果为新能源汽车企业及其投资者的战略管理实践提供了决策参考。In recent years,the subsidy policy of new energy vehicles(NEVs)has promoted the vigorous development of China’s NEV industry.In the past,scholars tended to focus on consumers’reactions to subsidy policies for NEVs,while attention to the reaction of investors is relatively scarce,especially in the context of major public emergencies.Based on the event study method,this study empirically tested the reaction mode of investors of NEV enterprises to China’s program of retrogressive subsidies(PRS)in the context of COVID-19 pandemic and discussed the differences in investors’reactions under different enterprise attributes(i.e.,whether listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange,whether located in a firsttier city,whether belonging to state-owned enterprises,and whether belonging to the upstream NEV industry).Our research results provide a reference for the strategic management practices of NEV enterprises and their investors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.178.138