论法庭对认罪认罚案件的实质审理——基于226份再审改判案例的分析  

On the Substantive Trial of Confession and Punishment Cases by the Court--Based on the analysis of 226 cases of retrial and revision of judgments

作　　者：奚玮[1] XI Wei

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学法学院

出　　处：《中国政法大学学报》2023年第5期86-99,共14页Journal Of CUPL

摘　　要：法庭对认罪认罚案件应当进行实质审理。226份再审改判案例反映认罪认罚案件存在法庭审查流程形式化、法庭采纳方式过于宽松、法庭认定程序不够明确等问题。法检关系的协调、证明模式的嬗变和量刑建议的约束是法庭对认罪认罚案件实质审理的困境,庭审存在形式化的风险。法庭对认罪认罚案件进行实质审理应做到:落实以审判为中心的诉讼原则,明晰不同程序中实质审理之要点,充分保障被追诉人的辩护权,对定罪事实与量刑事实实行分别审查原则。The court shall conduct substantive trial to the confession and punishment cases.226 cases of retrial and revision of judgments reflect the formalization of the court review process,the overly lenient approach adopted by the court,and the lack of clarity in the court’s determination procedure.The coordination of the relationship between court and procuratorate,the evolution of proof mode and the constraint of sentencing suggestions are the difficulties of substantive trial of guilty plea cases in the court,and there is also a risk of formalization.To realize the substantive trials of guilty plea cases,the court should implement the trial-centered litigation principle,clarify the key points of substantive trials in different procedures,fully protect the defendant's right to defence,and implement the principle of separate examination of criminal facts and sentencing facts.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 以审判为中心 实质审理 辩护权 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]