诱惑侦查法律容许性界限与法律后果分析  

On Tolerance Limits and Legal Consequences of Temptation Investigation

作　　者：兰梦茹 Lan Mengru(Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《铁道警察学院学报》2023年第4期103-112,共10页Journal of Railway Police College

基　　金：2021年度国家毒品问题治理研究中心项目“毒品犯罪中诱惑侦查的适用研究”[DR(2021)Y003];2019年度国家社会科学基金项目“刑事案件事实认定中的经验法则研究”(19BFX092)。

摘　　要：从容许性界限与法律后果两方面检视,可以发现我国的诱惑侦查制度设计单一,制度实施偏离立法目的:传统的二分法导致诱惑侦查法律容许性标准主观化;非法诱惑侦查认定门槛高;非法诱惑侦查法律后果未彰显“罪刑相当”之原则。面对诱惑侦查存在的积弊,我国亟须寻找与司法资源配套的解决路径:其一,重塑主客观分离的双重标准;其二,细化分离的双重标准下合法性认定要素;其三,矫正单一的违法法律后果,设立程序与实体法的双重法律后果。When examining tolerance limits and legal consequences,it can be found the imperfections of temptation investigation in China,such as the rigid regulation and its deviation from legislative purpose during the implementation,the arbitrariness of tolerance limits to temptation investigation resulted from traditional dichotomy,the strict identification for illegal investigation,the unproportional punishment to illegal investigation as to legal consequences.To reduce the long-standing malpractice of temptation investigation,the immediate solutions for China should be consistent with its judicial resources.Firstly,the duo standards of subjectivity and objectivity should be remoulded.Secondly,the elements of legitimacy determination according to duo standards should be refined.Thirdly,the single punishment should be corrected and legal consequences of both procedure and substantive law should be established.

关 键 词：诱惑侦查 双重法律标准 法律后果 补偿措施 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学]