检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张宏[1] 罗兰英 ZHANG Hong;LUO Lanying(School of Economics and Management,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou 310018,China)
出 处:《科学学与科学技术管理》2023年第8期31-49,共19页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大招标项目(19ZDA122)。
摘 要:创新是驱动绿色高质量发展的重要引擎,技术创新的意义导向逐渐从一般性视角向绿色、低碳等生态视角转变,“环境保护”成为低碳技术创新的本质意义。碳交易市场兼具政府和市场双重调节,在“双碳”愿景下对增进企业意义导向创新具有重要作用。以“二元合法性”为理论视角,基于2010—2019年碳交易试点八大行业企业的面板数据,采用双重差分法研究了碳交易政策对企业低碳技术创新的影响,及异质性企业环境责任和媒体环境关注在其关系中的作用机制。结果表明:碳交易政策的实施不仅有效提高了企业低碳技术创新水平,还有助于促进企业履行环境责任;前瞻型环境责任在碳交易政策与企业低碳技术创新关系中发挥中介效应,当企业履行反应型环境责任时可能存在“迎合效应”,其中介效应不显著;媒体环境关注能够正向调节碳交易政策与企业低碳技术创新的关系,其作为非正式环境规制可以与碳交易政策协同促进企业低碳技术创新。Innovation is an important engine driving green and high-quality development,and the significance of tech-nological innovation is gradually shifting from a general perspective to an ecological perspective such as green and low-carbon.Environmental protection has become the essential significance of low-carbon technological innovation.Car-bon emission trading policy is an environmental regulation system with dual regulation of both government and market,which plays an important role in promoting meaning oriented innovation of enterprises under the vision of"dual carbon".On the other hand,with the development of the"polycentric"governance theory,social subject such as the media are increasingly given more environmental governance rights,and an environmental multi-subjects co-governance model of the government subject,the market subject and the social subject in the context of China are gradually being constructed,and the governance forces of formal and informal environmental regulations are aggregating.In response to the legitimacy pressure generated by the constantly improving institutional environment,enterprises have resorted to more inclusive and sustainable low-carbon technological innovations.However,as a business behavior that needs to weigh the costs and benefits,the low-carbon innovation has a"dual"motivation of catering to institutional norms and seeking differential advantages under the isomorphic pressure of carbon emission trading policies.The two differentiated manifestations of forced response and active responsibility induced by different motivations will produce different low-carbon innovation effects.Under the dual carbon goal,how to break through the legitimacy paradox of"compliance"and"initiative"to promote low-carbon innovation of enterprises has become an urgent problem to be solved.In order to answer the above questions,this paper takes the"environmental governance community"as the core logic,cuts in from the perspective of"dual legitimacy"theory,and conducts research around the basic issue o
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15