陪审团说理的老传统与新模式  

Old Tradition and New Mode of Jury Reasoning

作　　者：高一飞 田超伟 GAO Yifei;TIAN Chaowei

机构地区：[1]广西大学法学院,530004

出　　处：《国外社会科学前沿》2023年第8期11-22,共12页JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCES

基　　金：中国法学会2021年度部级法学研究课题“司法权运行机制和运行规律研究”[CLS(2021)B03]的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：英美法系国家传统陪审团本着人民不会犯错的理念,不要求裁决说理;但西班牙、俄罗斯、比利时等大陆法系国家新兴陪审团要求裁决说理。欧洲人权法院裁决要求陪审团也要以适当方式说理,但是,并没有要求各国采用统一的说理模式。欧洲人权法院认为问题列表模式,由专业法官正式起草判决书、陪审团予以认可的说理模式,都是陪审团说理的适当方式。欧洲新兴陪审团说理的做法是陪审团制度的新模式,但并不意味着所有国家陪审团都会出现要求说理的新趋势。我国规定的人民陪审员说理与大陆法系传统国家陪审员说理方式总体上是相同的,我们可将西方陪审员说理的经验与中国国情和中国文化相结合,探索出具有中国特色的陪审员说理方式。The traditional jury in Anglo American legal system countries,based on the idea that the people will not make mistakes,does not require the verdict to reason;However,new juries in civil law countries such as Spain,Russia,Belgium,etc.require the verdict to be reasoned.The European Court of Human Rights ruled that the jury should also reason in an appropriate way,but it did not require countries to adopt a unified reasoning model.The European Court of Human Rights believes that the problem list model,the reasoning model formally drafted by professional judges and approved by the jury are all appropriate ways for the trial panel to reason.The new jury reasoning in Europe is a new model of the jury system,but it does not mean that the jury in all countries will have a new trend of requiring reasoning.The people's jurors'reasoning prescribed by China is generally the same as that of jurors in traditional countries of continental law system.In the future,we will combine the experience of western jurors'reasoning with China's national conditions and Chinese culture to explore the jurors'reasoning with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：传统陪审团 新兴陪审团 陪审团说理 问题列表 判决书说理 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]