朱熹与颜元道统观的虚实之辨  

On Reality and Nihility between Zhu Xi’s and Yan Yuan’s Confucian Orthodoxy Thought

作　　者：刘丽斌 LIU Libin(School of Marxism,Hebei University,Baoding 071002,China;Hebei University Library,Baoding 071002,China)

机构地区：[1]河北大学马克思主义学院,河北保定071002 [2]河北大学图书馆,河北保定071002

出　　处：《燕山大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第5期8-15,共8页Journal of Yanshan University:Philosophy and Social Science

基　　金：2021年度河北省社会科学发展研究课题“明末清初北学工夫论研究”(20210201357)。

摘　　要：道统作为儒者主观建构的观念性存在,其涵义是儒家宗旨性思想、文化或学说及其历时性人物传承谱系。从孔、孟以来,历代大儒已经具备了道统观念,但并未形成明确的作为道统观显性化、学说化的道统说。道统观可分为所传之道、传承谱系、传道方式以及卫道意识和弘道意识五个方面的内容。作为理学与反理学两大阵营的代表,朱熹与颜元的道统观存在着显著差异:所传之道有虚理与实事之别;传承谱系的历史人物选取标准上有思辨与致用之分;传道方式上有以心传道、以文传道与以身传道、以事传道之异。这些道统观上的差异反映出朱熹与颜元在哲学思想上的虚实之辨。As a conceptual existence constructed subjectively by Confucian scholars,Confucian Orthodoxy means Confucian tenet thought,culture or theory and its diachronic inherited character pedigree.Since Confu-cius and Mencius,the great Confucians of past dynasties have already possessed the view of Orthodoxy,but have not formed an explicit and doctrinal theory of Confucian Orthodoxy.The overall view of Confucian Or-thodoxy Thought can be divided into“Dao”,the pedigree of inheritance,the mode of preaching,the con-sciousness of Guardian and the consciousness of carrying forward orthodoxy.As representatives of Neo-Con-fucianism and anti-Neo-Confucianism,there are significant differences between Zhu Xi’s and Yan Yuan’s Confucian Orthodoxy Thought.There is a difference between imaginary“Li”and real“Act”in terms of“Dao”.Their different selection criteria of historical figures of inherited pedigree lies in speculation and ap-plication.The mode of preaching by mind and literature also differ from that by Life and“Act”.These differences in Confucian Orthodoxy Thought reflect the debate of reality and nihility between Zhu Xi and Yan Yuan in their philosophical thoughts.

关 键 词：儒家 道统 朱熹 颜元 

分 类 号：B21[哲学宗教—中国哲学]