《流行病学》课程思政资源库建设指标的研究  

Research on indicators of ideological and political resource database construction for curriculum of"Epidemiology"

作　　者：缪珂 高文静[1] 秦雪英[1] 吴涛[1] 詹思延[1] Miao Ke;Gao Wenjing;Qin Xueying;Wu Tao;Zhan Siyan(Key Laboratory of Epidemiology of Major Diseases,Ministry of Education/Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,School of Public Health,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系/重大疾病流行病学教育部重点实验室,北京100191

出　　处：《中华流行病学杂志》2023年第9期1473-1479,共7页Chinese Journal of Epidemiology

基　　金：北京大学医学部教育教学研究课题(2021YB36)。

摘　　要：目的构建针对《流行病学》教材的课程思政资源库建设指标。方法利用德尔菲专家法对来自4所高校及1个出版社的15名专家进行2轮专家函询,计算指标重要性和可行性得分与专家意见集中程度、协调程度。结果 2轮函询后,专家积极系数为100.00%(15/15),专家权威系数均为0.83,2轮函询Kendall’’sW分别为0.27(P<0.05)和0.33(P<0.05)。最终得到包含4项一级指标与31项二级指标的《流行病学》课程思政资源库建设指标。结论本研究函询过程具有科学性,构建的《流行病学》课程思政资源库建设指标具有一定的权威性,可促进《流行病学》课程思政资源库建立。Objective To construct indicators of the ideological and political resource database construction for the curriculum of"Epidemiology".Methods Two rounds of expert consultation were conducted in 15 experts from 4 universities and 1 textbook publishing house using the Delphi method,and the importance and feasibility scores of the indicators were calculated with the degree of concentration and coordination of experts'opinions.Results In the two rounds of consultation,the experts'positive coefficient of the two questionnaires were both 100.00%(15/15),the authoritative coefficients of experts were both 0.83,and the Kendall's W was 0.27(P<0.05)and 0.33(P<0.05),respectively.Consensus was reached on 4 primary indicators and 31 secondary indicators.Conclusion The process of this study is scientific,and the indicators for the construction of ideological and political resource database for the curriculum of"Epidemiology"are authoritative,which can promote the establishment of ideological and political resource database for the curriculum of"Epidemiology".

关 键 词：课程思政 资源库 流行病学 德尔菲法 

分 类 号：G641[文化科学—高等教育学] R-4[文化科学—教育学]