基于WSR与AHP-FCE的经济学专业课程体系评价研究  

A Study on the Evaluation of Economics Curriculum System Based on WSR and AHP-FCE

作　　者：李根[1] 魏舒冰 李文昌[1] 康红琴 刘荣飞[1] LI Gen;WEI Shubing;LI Wenchang

机构地区：[1]江苏科技大学经济管理学院,江苏镇江212100

出　　处：《高教学刊》2023年第29期11-16,共6页Journal of Higher Education

基　　金：江苏省教育科学“十四五”规划2021年度课题“‘互联网+’背景下江苏高校学生创新创业教育的路径优化和新模式构建”(D/2021/01/55);江苏科技大学2018年度本科教育教学改革研究课题“我校经济学专业课程体系重构的研究与实践”(XJG2018031)。

摘　　要：科学合理的高校课程评价体系是衡量高校人才培养质量的重要方式。该文基于WSR系统方法论,从物理、事理、人理三个维度构建经济学专业课程评价指标体系,采用层次分析法确定评价指标权重,运用专家打分法获得模糊评价矩阵,采用模糊综合评价法确定最终评价结果。以江苏科技大学经济学专业为例,判断其得分接近“良”的水平,特别要改进物理与人理维度指标,应注重实践条件的完善,与用人单位建立良好的关系,调动学生的主观能动性,优化课程体系培养方向。该文有助于高校认清经济学专业课程体系存在的不足,为优化经济学专业课程体系提供科学的决策依据。A scientific and reasonable curriculum evaluation system is an important way to measure the quality of talent training in colleges and universities.Based on the WSR system methodology,this paper constructs the evaluation index system of economics major courses from the three dimensions of Wuli,Shili and Renli.Then it applies the analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight of the evaluation index and uses the expert scoring method to obtain the fuzzy evaluation matrix.Finally,it uses the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation to determine the final evaluation result.Take the economics major of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology as an example to judge that its score is close to the level of "good".In particular,it should improve the Wuli dimension and the Renli dimension indicators.In other words,it should pay attention to the improvement of practical conditions,establish a good relationship with employers extensively,mobilize the subjective initiative of students and optimize the training direction of the curriculum system.This paper is helpful for colleges and universities to recognize the shortcomings of the curriculum system of economics and provide scientific decision-making basis for optimizing the curriculum system of economics.

关 键 词：经济学专业 课程体系 物理-事理-人理 模糊综合评价 指标体系 

分 类 号：G640[文化科学—高等教育学]