检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:玉炫 宋旭萍[2,3,4] 王琪 杨克虎 陈耀龙[1,2,4,5,6] YU Xuan;SONG Xuping;WANG Qi;YANG Kehu;CHEN Yaolong(Evidence-Based Medicine Center,School of Basic Medical Sciences,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;Evidence-based Social Science Research Center,School of Public Health,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;Department of Health Research Methods,Evidence and Impact,McMaster University,Hamilton L8S 4L6,Canada;Innovation Laboratory for Evidence-based Social Science,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;Research Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences(2021RU017),School of Basic Medical Sciences,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;WHO Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China)
机构地区:[1]兰州大学基础医学院循证医学中心,兰州730000 [2]兰州大学公共卫生学院循证社会科学研究中心,兰州730000 [3]加拿大麦克马斯特大学卫生研究方法、证据与影响力系,汉密尔顿L8S4L6 [4]兰州大学循证社会科学交叉创新实验室,兰州730000 [5]中国医学科学院循证评价与指南研究创新单元(2021RU017),兰州大学基础医学院,兰州730000 [6]世界卫生组织指南实施与知识转化合作中心,兰州730000
出 处:《中国循证医学杂志》2023年第10期1229-1235,共7页Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(编号:19ZDA142)。
摘 要:随着全球突发公共卫生事件的爆发,各行各业对证据与决策关注日盛,成为改变研究的计划、生产、综合、实施以及知证决策的一个重要触发因素。全球证据委员会的成立以及两份报告的发布,进一步强调知证决策在应对社会挑战中的重要性。随着循证社会科学理念的传播和发展,需要不断完善从证据到决策的生态系统,为不同决策者应对社会挑战提供科学的方法和途径。本文旨在对《全球证据委员会报告》解读,阐述证据的需求和供给、全球公共产品以及应对社会挑战的八条核心建议,提出循证社会科学从证据到决策生态系统面临的关键问题及其相关对策,促使证据成为各类决策者日常工作和生活的中心。As the global health crisis erupts, there is an unprecedented focus on evidence across all sectors,becoming a critical trigger for changing research plans, development, synthesis, implementation, and evidence-informed decision-making. The establishment of the Global Commission on Evidence and the publication of two reports further emphasize the significance of evidence-informed decision-making in addressing social challenges. With the dissemination and development of evidence-based social science, there is a need to continually improve the ecosystem from evidence to decision and provide rigorous methods and approaches for different decision-makers to address social challenges. This article aims to interpret the Evidence Commission Report and explain the demand and supply of evidence, global public goods, and eight most-important Evidence Commission recommendations that can be used to address most social challenges. It also presents the key issues and insights that the evidence-based social science ecosystem faces from evidence to decision-making, putting evidence at the center of everyday work and life.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.151