检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔希晨 CUI Xichen(Institute of Chinese Thoughts and Culture,Northwest University,Xi'an Shanxi 710127,China)
机构地区:[1]西北大学中国思想文化研究所,西安710127
出 处:《乐山师范学院学报》2023年第9期120-125,135,共7页Journal of Leshan Normal University
摘 要:中国哲学合法性问题需要哲学发生学的回答。西方哲学的发生,根据不同的标准,在古希腊有三个人物是关键性突破,他们分别是泰勒斯、柏拉图、亚里士多德。泰勒斯的哲学是人类对世界理性认识的开始,柏拉图则第一次将哲学用于解决人类生存问题,亚里士多德是真正意义上哲学学科的建构者。从泰勒斯和柏拉图这两个起点来看,中国哲学合法性是毋庸置疑的,但亚里士多德的哲学学科标准似乎把中国思想史上的大部分内容排除在哲学之外。实际上,中国哲学是有世界哲学的共性的,之所以被质疑合法性,是因为中国哲学具有重视道德实践的特性。今天,中国哲学合法性问题应当成为一个开放的引导式问题,以保障中国哲学学科发展的多种可能性。The legitimacy of Chinese philosophy needs the answer of philosophical genesis.According to different standards,three characters in ancient Greece are the key breakthroughs in the occurrence of western philosophy,namely Thales,Plato and Aristotle.Thales's philosophy is the beginning of mankind's rational understanding of the world,while Plato's philosophy is the first solution to human survival.Aristotle is the founder of Philosophy in the real sense.From the two starting points of Thales and Plato,the legitimacy of Chinese philosophy is beyond doubt,but Aristotle's philosophical discipline standard seems to exclude most contents in the history of Chinese thoughts from philosophy.In fact,Chinese philosophy has the commonness of world philosophy.The reason why it is questioned is that Chinese philosophy has the particularity of attaching importance to moral practice.Currently,the legitimacy of Chinese philosophy should become an open and guiding issue to ensure the various possibilities of the development of Chinese philosophy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.51